Why Facebook’s New Fan Model Is Total Crap
Facebook prides itself on, and we the users, embrace it for its emphasis on privacy. We use the platform as, essentially, an online social directory, where we interact strictly with those who are in our existing networks. We have access to a lot of very detailed and personal information on Facebook — information that many would only feel comfortable sharing with those who they know personally, not the whole world.
This level of privacy is very different from that of Twitter, where it’s perfectly acceptable and even encouraged to follow new people, to build a new network, to find new resources and sources of information.
If an unfamiliar name were to add you on Facebook, you would likely ask yourself, “Where do I know this person from?” If you don’t know the person, they are likely to be in at least a similar network as you. With one platform focusing on privacy and another on openness, Facebook and Twitter have drifted away from each other and as a result, differ greatly in their use cases.
So why is Facebook attempting to tackle new ground—territory that almost seems antithetical to its bottom line: privacy? The users that we want to interact with on Facebook are those we already know and are already friends with, or could be friends with, so what is the point of just becoming a fan of another user’s profile when you could get the whole package?
If another user doesn’t reciprocate your desire to interact on the platform and refuses to be your friend, would you really want to settle for 1-way interaction? Such a situation almost seems desperate and what many Facebook users would call, stalker-like.
The only instances where I could see non-reciprocal friendships are limited to those with (1) high-profile individuals (celebrities) or (2) big brands (businesses). However, these entities are likely to already have Pages (and would prefer to protect their personal profiles from the general public), an area of Facebook that users have already embraced.
As Page fans, we already receive updates and can interact with the brand, which makes the new fan model totally redundant. Additionally, adding new status updates from individuals who are not really your friends to the wealth of information we already consume on Facebook only adds to the clutter. As Hazel Grace of METZ partner company Socialbees wrote in a previous post, “as you grow your friend list into a stranger list, your news feed becomes less and less valuable and extremely time consuming to manage.”
While Facebook seems like it would have the potential to be a great platform for sharing and spreading information on an even greater scale than Twitter, the idea of sharing status updates on its platform just wouldn’t work as well. The status updates that you gather information from would most likely be shared within the same network of people that you pulled it from, as networks on Facebook rely on real relationships, and reality is: our social circles overlap.
Perhaps Facebook should be spending more time on sussing out the inefficiencies and limitations of its branded Pages (more on that later) than trying to take on a platform that doesn’t really compete with it in the first place.
Melissa Chen is a Strategy Associate at METZ. She is a Media Studies major at UC Berkeley and is the President of Public Relations @ Cal.
Most Recent Articles
WEBINAR: Monetizing The Social Customer Without Breaking The Law September 2, 2010
While the Social Web is an exciting venue for commerce,…
Lessons from the Vault: Turn Your Social Web Strategy into Effective Web Page Design September 2, 2010
Today’s upload from the Vault is a webinar that Adam…
Fresh from the Vault - "No Time, No Money, No Problem" August 10, 2010
Today’s release from the Vault is “No Time, No Money,…
Who To Follow In SocialCRM August 6, 2010
I get asked this question all the time: “Who should…
From The Vault: The ROI Of The Social Customer August 2, 2010
Here at Metz Consulting, we decided, a few weeks ago,…
7 reasons Why Salesforce Doesn't Really Work On The iPad July 28, 2010
Christina and I went down to the Apple store last…
Hotel Lobbyists Strike Back Against Sites Like AirBNB (With A Senate Billl) July 27, 2010
I read an article by the effervescent Paul Carr (who…
Talking Tampons & The Social Customer July 26, 2010
I just heard from Juan Martinez over at CRM Magazine.…
Why We've Really Opened The Vault July 26, 2010
I’ve been in somewhat of a “fight” with Metallica’s Lars…
State of the Social Web - Q4 2009 July 22, 2010
In this 2009 presentation, Metz Consulting identifies the major changes…











Leave a Comment
Commenting is closed for this article.
Luis Antezana, on Sat Jun 27, 12:46 AM, wrote:
You commented on this at Mashable <http://bit.ly/bnlAQ> and I replied. I think you’re off the mark on this one. One thing I didn’t say there: Facebook is not primarily about privacy. It is about allowing people to express themselves to a chosen audience. Allowing the new follow feature gives people the option of expanding their chosen audience to the public, for user-selectable status updates. At the same time there’s nothing in that which reduces privacy whatsoever. Everything is still within the user’s control. Everything else is in my reply at Mashable. I appreciate the opportunity to debate.
P.S. That giant head to the right of this article is really freaking me out
Veken Gueyikian, on Fri Jul 3, 11:36 AM, wrote:
Another benefit of merging the private Personal profile with the public personal “celebrity” Pages is that fans can tag and view photos/videos of people they follow without being a fan.
As pages become more like profiles, I think merging these two types of “personal” profiles makes a lot of sense.
How do you determine when someone is popular enough to require a celebrity page? shouldn’t even 1 fan be enough? Twitter has shown us that we are all celebrities to a degree now! Living in a private world is no longer a priority for most of us.